Monday, 19 August 2024

Miskatonic Monday #297: The Missing Fossil

Between October 2003 and October 2013, Chaosium, Inc. published a series of books for Call of Cthulhu under the Miskatonic University Library Association brand. Whether a sourcebook, scenario, anthology, or campaign, each was a showcase for their authors—amateur rather than professional, but fans of Call of Cthulhu nonetheless—to put forward their ideas and share with others. The programme was notable for having launched the writing careers of several authors, but for every Cthulhu Invictus, The Pastores, Primal State, Ripples from Carcosa, and Halloween Horror, there was Five Go Mad in Egypt, Return of the Ripper, Rise of the Dead, Rise of the Dead II: The Raid, and more...

The Miskatonic University Library Association brand is no more, alas, but what we have in its stead is the Miskatonic Repository, based on the same format as the DM’s Guild for Dungeons & Dragons. It is thus, “...a new way for creators to publish and distribute their own original Call of Cthulhu content including scenarios, settings, spells and more…” To support the endeavours of their creators, Chaosium has provided templates and art packs, both free to use, so that the resulting releases can look and feel as professional as possible. To support the efforts of these contributors, Miskatonic Monday is an occasional series of reviews which will in turn examine an item drawn from the depths of the Miskatonic Repository.

—oOo—
Publisher: Chaosium, Inc.
Author: Ashiki

Setting: Uvs Nuur, the Mongolian People’s Republic, 1925
Product: Scenario
What You Get: Twenty-four page, 32.05 MB Full Colour PDF

Elevator Pitch: The Mongolia that time forgot
Plot Hook: The chance to outdo Roy Chapman Andrews and make the find of the century
Plot Support: Staging advice, six pre-generated Investigators, two handouts, three maps, and three Mythos monsters.
Production Values: Adequate

Pros
# Rare scenario translated from the Japanese
# Not a hunt for the Mongolian Death Worm
# Decent pre-generated Investigators
# Eremophobia
# Scoleciphobia
# Batrachophobia

Cons
# Needs a good edit
# No investigation, no paleontology
# Long, messy set-up time
# Panama Canal

Conclusion
# Needs a better developed set-up or it should cut to the chase—which is what it becomes
# A scenario to do up rather than run from the page
# Reviews from R’lyeh Discommends

4 comments:

  1. I've been reading your reviews (on and off) for _many_ years at this point, and a recurring note that I, erm, note, is "needs a good edit".

    As an aficionado of that art myself, I'm really curious to hear more about this. Both for individual products, to better understand what's off with them, but also to hear your view on good writing, good structuring, and good presentation in RPGs. Any chance of a stand-alone, non-review article on this some day?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sadly unlikely, mostly due to lack of time and too many reviews to write.

      I am a professional editor, working in localisation by day, and the occasional and more interesting gaming editing by night, so I do notice these things. Typically, a light edit needs a fairly simple spell check, whilst a good edit needs more attention and likely some development, whilst if I review to a product needing development, it does match the author’s ambitions. Fortunately, there are good guides to writing out there and many others have commented on what that might be.

      Delete
  2. I'm really curious why "Panama Canal" is listed as a con.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because the expedition does not go via the Panama Canal (or San Francisco) as it logically should.

      Delete