In Mansters, you roleplay one of these monsters. Classic, even universal monsters. The Vampire, the Witch, the Werewolf, the Mummy, the Not-Frankenstein, the Ghost, the Zombie. Monsters who have lost what they once were, that is, scary, yet they still have the same powers for which they were known. Monsters who in attempting to understand why the world has changed and why humans are no longer scared of them, have lost part of what made them monstrous. And have thus become depressed at their loss of status and loss of opportunity to embrace their true, monstrous natures. Since they are trying to understand humans, they do what every human would do and that is to seek therapy. Fortunately, Doctor Lector runs Depressives Anonymous at which every monster can unburden himself and come to terms with the world that he finds himself in. He also finds an outlet for his monstrousness, seeking the evil men and women of the world and striking fear into them, to prove himself what he once was.
Mansters: Fight Against the Real Monsters of the World is a storytelling game, a satire upon horror stories and the modern political and financial worlds. Published following a successful Kickstarter campaign, it is from Black Lantern, the Greek publisher best known for the Soulmist, the post-apocalyptic setting of a world literally divided into two by darkness and light, written for use with Dungeons & Dragons, Fifth Edition. The aim of the Player Characters—or Monsters—in the game is restore balance in the world, both internally and externally. Externally, they want to return a sense of fear to the world, but keep themselves unknowable. There is a Veil between the ordinary world of humans and the world of Monsters, the Monsters living as ordinary humans on one side and unleashing, even revelling in, their monstrous nature on the other side. A Monster can draw upon his monstrous nature to achieve strange and arcane feats, but pierce that Veil too often and too readily, and a Doom may befall upon him. Internally, they want to understand humans better and restore their self-respect. So, they set out to stop those in power and control who spread fear, uncertainty, and hatred, and commit crimes that go unpunished, so that ultimately, humans will fear monsters.
A Monster in Mansters is first defined by his Abilities and Skills. There are three Abilities—Body, Mind, and Heart—and each Ability has four associated skills. Each Ability is represented by a circle, which is divided into four quarters, or Hacks, and each Hack into two Slices, so that an Ability has four Hacks and eight Slices. Similarly, each Skill can be divided into four Hacks and eight Slices. He will also have a Monster type—Ghost, Mummy, Not-Frankenstein, Vampire, Werewolf, Witch, or Zombie, a Charisma, and a Flaw, two more Banes, and a starting Monstrosity Level. The Charisma is the Monster’s positive quirk, ability, or power; the Flaw a negative, limiting trait; and Banes the aspects of the Monster which will impede him. Some Banes are mandatory, whilst the others a player can choose.
To create a Monster, a player selects a Monster type and then Charisma and a Flaw, two more Banes, and a starting Monstrosity Level. Each of his Abilities starts at two Hacks and he can then assign a further two Hacks. He then determines the number of Slices his Monster has in each Ability and assigns that number of Hacks to the four Skills associated with the Ability. The process is quick and simple.
Dirk Fordice
Type: The Ghost
Charisma: Mind Over Matter
Flaw: Incognito Window
Banes: It’s Cold Out There, Chatterbox
Body 2 (4) – Fight 1, Stealth 2, Shoot 0, Handle 1
Mind 3 (6) – Knowledge 1, Perception 2, Investigation 2, Politics 1
Heart 3 (6) – Manipulate 2, Insight 2, Intimidate 1, Streetwise 1
Mansters uses what it calls the Hack & Slice System. It makes clear that it is not a ‘hack & slash’ roleplaying game. To have his Monster undertake an action, a player will roll either a number of six-sided dice equal to the number of Hacks his Monster has in an Ability or the number of Hacks in an Ability and a Skill. The aim is to roll successes, that is, rolls of five or more. A Difficult task would require two successes for a Monster to succeed, whilst an ‘Are you insane?’ task would need four. To make a task easier, a player can spend Slices. A Slice spent from an Ability lowers the number of Successes required to succeed, whereas a Slice spent from a Skill a reroll of any dice that have not rolled Successes. A short rest will restore some, but not all Slices, whereas a long rest of several days under the care of Doctor Lector will restore them all.
Confrontations can be physical, mental, or social. They are opposed rolls, with the winner inflicting damage equal to number of Successes rolled more than the defender. Each point of damage inflicted removes one Slice, whether that is physical damage from Body, mental damage from Mind, and social damage from Heart. If a combatant rolls two Successes more than his opponent, he gains the Edge. This applies to both the Monster and the NPC, and gives limited narrative control to the combatant with the Edge. For the Monster, the plater decides what happens and for his opponent, the Doctor—as the Game Master is known—decides. If a roll is failed, it adds to the Monster’s ‘Skutendo’ clock.
When a Monster wants to use one of his Monster Superpowers, his player makes a Monstrosity roll. This is equal to the Monster’s Monstrosity Level. If the number of Successes rolled is equal to the Difficulty of the particular Monster Superpower, it is activated. However, this is not easy and it has consequences. A higher Monstrosity Level means that the roll is more likely to succeed, but a high Monstrosity Level will add even more to the Monster’s ‘Skutendo’ clock. A player can choose to lower the Difficulty by expending Ability Hacks, but this will lead to exhaustion if done too often. A player is thus forced to make a choice and as much as Monster strives for some kind of balance in game, there is no balance here. The consequence is to add to the Monster’s ‘Skutendo’ clock and also to the Doctor’s ‘D(oo)M’ Clock.
So what is Skutendo? It represents unlucky events that occur near the Monster, rolled randomly. For example, it could be ‘The Little Cousin’ in which the Monster’s aunt asks him to look after his cousin or a ‘Monster Movie Craze’ in which people start dressing up and acting as the monster, making it more difficult for him to intimidate anyone. It is triggered when the Monster’s ‘Skutendo’ clock is filled and then cleared again. When it is triggered it, it also adds to the ‘D(oo)M’ Clock. This tracks the likelihood of Hunters turning up to look for the Monsters, the Slices from the ‘D(oo)M’ Clock being spent by the Doctor to bring them into play.
They include the sibling monster hunters, the Losechester Sisters, Van Helsing, and Scrood-Be-U, a gang of monster hunters which travels in a van called the Misery Machine and whose members benefit from eating Scrood-be-Snacks. Antagonists in Mansters are talked about in terms of archetypes (as are the Player Characters). These consist of Mr. Moneybags, The Man in the High Chair, the Long Arm of the Law, the Underworld, and so on. These are supported by detailed examples, such as Elton Mask for the Mr. Moneybags. It is here in the naming references that Mansters best and most obviously shows its satire. There is some advice for the Doctor, but it is very light. There is, though, an introductory adventure in which the Monsters investigate a landlord who is evicting all of his tenants to turn a block of flats into short stays for Airbnb.
One issue with the scenario is that it does not fully showcase all of the roleplaying game’s mechanics since a Hunter is not intended to appear as the ‘D(oo)M’ Clock fills. This is disappointing, but it means that the Doctor can save Mansters’ Hunters for a scenario of her own. Oddly, it does introduce another mechanic, ‘Initiative Points’, which essentially tracks the effects of the Monsters’ actions and determines how well they have done at the conclusion. What this means is that it is not entirely the typical adventure the Doctor might expect as an introductory adventure for Mansters when it comes to showing the rules in action. This does not mean that the actual adventure itself is bad as it is otherwise enjoyable and nicely detailed. It also showcases how a typical adventure starts with the Monsters all attending Doctor Lector’s Depressives Anonymous sessions, which are as much social events as they are therapy sessions. Despite the name, the Doctor is not evil, but part of later therapy sessions will involve some reflection of the adventure or situation that just happened. These post-investigation/post-defeat the banality of evil session are also where the players expend Experience Points. This has the potential for some interesting roleplaying scenes if the Doctor and players want them.
Unfortunately, the rulebook does not list the experience point costs for improving the Monsters. Nor does it list the Monstrosity Levels for each type of Monsters. Nor does it really explore how a Monster’s Monstrosity Level goes up or down. In fact, only the Vampire has a Bane which can increase his Monstrosity Level. Instead, Experience Points are intended to be spent on permanently lowering the Difficulty of activating a Monster’s powers. Ultimately, it may be up to the Doctor to decide, depending upon a Monster’s actions, whether his Monstrosity Level goes up or down. Mansters should have explored this aspect of its design and developed mechanics for it.
Physically, Mansters is well presented. The artwork is fun, capturing the tedious normality of the Monsters’ lives versus their true nature. The writing could have been clearer in places and it is repetitive in others. The cover also suggests that monsters other than the ones given in the book can be played when that is not the case.
Mansters does come as a boxed set. In addition to the rulebook, the box also contains a set of dice, a deck of ‘Skutendo’ cards, Monster portfolios for each Monster type, and oddly, a set of Monster-themed coasters and a set of Monster-themed bookmarks! One advantage of the boxed set is that the Monster portfolios do give each Monster’s starting Monstrosity Level.
There can be no doubt that the intent of Mansters is good, a satire of classic monsters versus the banality of modern live and the banality of modern evil, and of old evil versus new evil. Unfortunately, Mansters does not quite achieve what aims for. Mansters can be played as is, but the lack of interplay with and of potential to shift the Mansters’ Monstrosity Levels means the roleplaying game’s intended imbalance between the Monsters’ everyday, humdrum human existence and their inhuman, monstrous nature cannot be explored as it really should.
No comments:
Post a Comment