1974 is an important year for the gaming hobby. It is the year that Dungeons & Dragons was introduced, the original RPG from which all other RPGs would ultimately be derived and the original RPG from which so many computer games would draw for their inspiration. It is fitting that the current owner of the game, Wizards of the Coast, released the new version, Dungeons & Dragons, Fifth Edition, in the year of the game’s fortieth anniversary. To celebrate this, Reviews from R’lyeh will be running a series of reviews from the hobby’s anniversary years, thus there will be reviews from 1974, from 1984, from 1994, and from 2004—the thirtieth, twentieth, and tenth anniversaries of the titles. These will be retrospectives, in each case an opportunity to re-appraise interesting titles and true classics decades on from the year of their original release.
Saturday, 20 December 2025
1975: Boot Hill
Saturday, 16 August 2025
1975: En Garde!
1974 is an important year for the gaming hobby. It is the year that Dungeons & Dragons was introduced, the original RPG from which all other RPGs would ultimately be derived and the original RPG from which so many computer games would draw for their inspiration. It is fitting that the current owner of the game, Wizards of the Coast, released the new version, Dungeons & Dragons, Fifth Edition, in the year of the game’s fortieth anniversary. To celebrate this, Reviews from R’lyeh will be running a series of reviews from the hobby’s anniversary years, thus there will be reviews from 1974, from 1984, from 1994, and from 2004—the thirtieth, twentieth, and tenth anniversaries of the titles. These will be retrospectives, in each case an opportunity to re-appraise interesting titles and true classics decades on from the year of their original release.
Yet, En Garde! has always been overlooked as a roleplaying game and may not even be a roleplaying game in the traditional sense of even the Dungeons & Dragons of 1974. There are good reasons for this. The game play is rarely one of being sat round the table in the traditional sense because a player programs the actions of his character a month in advance. There is none of the immediacy of a traditional roleplaying game, no back and forth between the players and their characters, or indeed between the players, their characters, and the Game Master’s NPCs. Nor is there a real strong sense of place, since the Player Characters move between locations automatically, whether between their club and their barracks, between their mistress’ apartments and the duelling ground, and between Paris and wherever the French army is in campaign. Consequently, En Garde! abstracts France rather giving it any sense of place or geography.
Our sample Player Character, Cyrille Mageau, is of a very lowly origins, with barely a Louis d’or to his name. His lack of status means that his prospects are equally as low, but Cyril is ambitious and not without potential. Given his very high Military Ability, his best option is to enlist and prove himself on campaign. If he is successful there, he may improve his fortunes in Paris.
Social Level: 1
Class: Commoner
Sibling Rank: Bastard
Father’s Position: Peasant
Strength 09 Expertise 13 Constitution 13 Endurance 117
Military Ability: 6
Initial Funds: 9 Allowance: 0 Inheritance: 0
Once per year, members of a regiment will have to go on campaign for a complete season. There is a chance of a Player Character being killed in battle, but he could try to be heroic and make a name for himself, get mentioned in dispatches, get promoted, and take some battlefield plunder. Being mentioned in dispatches gains a Player Character national recognition and ongoing Status Points. In the long term, a Player Character can apply for various positions in both the military and the government. For example, being appointed regimental adjutant, Army Quartermaster-General, or Inspector-General of the Infantry, or Commissioner of Public Safety, Minster of War, or Minister Without Portfolio. Titles can also be won. Once a Player Character achieves a high position, he gains some Influence that can be used to help others.
One way in which En Garde! is not a roleplaying game is in how little scope there is for the players to roleplay and affect the world around the characters through roleplaying. Perhaps through delivering an insult to a member of a rival from another regiment? Further, players will find themselves playing at odds with each other when they join rival regiments or compete for the same mistress or position. In some ways, to get the most out of En Garde! it is best for the players to play characters who are rivals and so it is adversarial to one degree or another.
However, within its scope—and as a roleplaying game—En Garde! is innovative. Not as the first historical roleplaying game, since Boot Hill was published the same year, but certainly the first roleplaying game that focused on society and social activities. It is all about a potential musketeer’s progress in society and the activities that he has to undertake to order to climb the social ladder and at each rung, maintain that position. Compare that to the dungeon-focused play of three of the other roleplaying games—Dungeons & Dragons, Empire of the Petal Throne, and Tunnels & Trolls—then available in 1975.
Physically, En Garde! is surprisingly well presented and written. Illustrated with a mix of period pieces, the only real downside is that it starts talking about duels rather than characters and what they do and who interact with each other beyond duels. This organisation lends itself to the idea that the rest of the rules grew out of wanting more to the game and more reasons to duel.
It appears that En Garde! was never reviewed in the roleplaying hobby press, though it was covered by magazines and publications devoted to games. The designer and publisher, Charles Vasey reviewed it in Games & Puzzles Issue 55 (December 1976) saying that GDW has, “…[P]icked a really splendid period for the new duelling game.” He was critical though, saying, “Despite its complexity, the system does not play as well as one might think. Often duels end very swiftly.” and “It is complex and convoluted, and it feels like real life. Players will soon find they have natural enemies and rivals who must be crushed directly or by a hired blade. One must seek to be in the best set, but beware bankruptcy or it’s the frontier regiment and disgrace until you pay off your debts.”
Similarly, games designer Greg Costikyan reviewed En Garde! in ‘Games fen will Play’ in Fantastic Science Fiction. Vol. 27, No. 10. (July 1980). He was very positive, calling En Garde! “[T]he the first well-written set of role-playing rules.... En Garde! was the first role-playing game by a major company and by established designers; and, as one might expect, it set new standards for role-playing rules — standards to which few subsequent games have risen.”
Perhaps the oddest vehicle for a review was The Playboy Winner’s Guide to Board Games (Playboy Press, 1979). Author John Jackson said that, “There is a minimum of player interaction; play is geared toward individual deeds rather than group action.”, but that, “Although lacking neither color nor detail, the rules to En Garde! are clear and comprehensible.” He concluded that, “If it lacks the scope of true fantasy role-playing games, it’s not as time-consuming, either, and it appears to be a pleasant diversion.”
En Garde! is not a roleplaying game per se. There is more of a simulation to it, a means of modelling the life of an officer and gentlemen in the early seventeenth century as he makes his way in life and attempt to better himself. Yet like any simulation, the result of dice rolls on the roleplaying game’s various tables sets up interesting, intriguing, and involving results that draw you in and make you want to explore how to resolve them and how to respond to them. This is where the roleplaying potential lies in En Garde!, even if it is not written to support roleplaying and all but ignores it. Ultimately, it has been shown again and again, in multiple games, all this is best handled and roleplayed away from the table and at distance, whether by mail or email.
Sunday, 5 January 2025
1975: Tunnels & Trolls
1974 is an important year for the gaming hobby. It is the year that Dungeons & Dragons was introduced, the original RPG from which all other RPGs would ultimately be derived and the original RPG from which so many computer games would draw for their inspiration. It is fitting that the current owner of the game, Wizards of the Coast, released the new version, Dungeons & Dragons, Fifth Edition, in the year of the game’s fortieth anniversary, and the new edition of that, Dungeons & Dragons, 2024, in the year of the game’s fiftieth anniversary. To celebrate this, Reviews from R’lyeh will be running a series of reviews from the hobby’s anniversary years, thus there will be reviews from 1974, from 1984, from 1994, and from 2004—the thirtieth, twentieth, and tenth anniversaries of the titles. These will be retrospectives, in each case an opportunity to re-appraise interesting titles and true classics decades on from the year of their original release.
For example, Trigeor and his Dwarven friend, Glorimnaeck Orchelm, have ventured into a dungeon, known as the Orc ’Ole. Despite carrying a compass, the pair get lost and find themselves being attacked by a band of Orcs. There are three of them, each with a Monster Rating of twelve. Individually, the Dungeon Master would be rolling one die and adding an ADD of six on the first found, but only two on later rounds. Collectively, they have a Monster Rating of thirty-six, meaning that the Referee will roll five dice and add eighteen on the first round, but only nine on later rounds. Glorimnaeck Orchelm’s player will roll four dice and add one for his Warhammer, and then another twenty-six for his Adds.
The Referee rolls two, three, three, three, five, and six for a total of twenty-two, which together with the Orcs’ Adds, gives a total Hit Points of forty. Glorimnaeck Orchelm’s player rolls better with four, four, five, six, and six and adds one to give a total of twenty-six, which with the Dwarf’s Adds, means he has a grand total Hit Points of fifty-two! The Orcs’ Hit Points are subtracted from Glorimnaeck Orchelm’s and the resulting twelve Hit Points reduce the Orcs’ Monster Rating by twelve to twenty-four. The twelve is also enough to reduce one of the Orc’s Monster Rating to zero, so the Dungeon Master rules that Glorimnaeck Orchelm has smashed his head in and he goes flying back into the cave. Next round, the Orcs will have a Monster Rating of twenty-four, meaning that the Referee will roll three dice and only apply an Add of four!
As Glorimnaeck Orchelm gamely holds back the band of Orcs, Trigeor holds a torch so that it is not dark and prepares himself just in case he has to cast a spell. Just behind the melee, the Magic-User spots another Orc, bigger than the others. This is their boss and he has a Monster Rating of eighteen, meaning that the Dungeon Master will roll two dice for him and include an Add of nine in the first round and an Add of three in later rounds. Quickly, Trigeor cries out, “Take that you fiend!” and casts the spell of the same name at the newly arrived Orc. It costs him five Strength rather than the usual six, since he is casting it through his staff, which being only a makeshift one, fizzes and burns as the magic passes through it. The spell means that Trigeor will be using his I.Q. to attack the Orc, and in addition will gain a single die as normal. Since Trigeor has an I.Q. of eighteen, it is going to kill the Orc. The Orcs attacking the Dwarf look behind them as they hear a popping sound to discover their boss collapsing to the floor, steam rising from his eyes and ears!
It not be until the second edition of Tunnels & Trolls was reviewed in ‘Tunnels and Trolls: A Review of Sorts’ by Brant Bates in The Space Gamer Issue Number 3 (1975). He highlighted the differences between Tunnels & Trolls and Dungeons & Dragons, beginning with, “There is no sexist bias In T&T, Female characters come out exactly as created by the dice--not reduced in size and strength by an arbitrary fraction just because they are female.” before going on to look at other differences in terms of character creation and combat. He was overall positive about the art, saying, “It is mostly by a Phoenix fan artist named Rob Carver, and it ranges from the gorgeous to the ridiculous--mostly the latter. The cartoon to illustrate the magical spells are very droll, and the portrait of St. Andre captures his very soul.” He concluded with, “T&T has been sold from coast to coast, but is still most popular in Phoenix, where it has become the official game of the organized SF club there. It is very playable, and a lot of fun--great for stretching the old imagination. I recommend it for fantasy fans who are not purists, and who do not necessarily believe a game’s quality depends on its cost.”
Lewis Pulsipher reviewed the British version published by Strategy Games Ltd. in ‘Open Box’ in White Dwarf Issue No. 2 (August/September 1977). He said, “The excuse for publication here and now, presumably, is that there is a need for a cheap and understandable role playing game for those who can’t afford or make sense of D&D.” but was otherwise not positive, criticising the lack of clarity in the rules, the amount of creative effort that a Referee had to put into the game, and the humour in the game, especially in the names of the spells. His conclusion was that, “Anyone who likes T&T will sooner or later ‘graduate’ to the much more satisfying (and much more widely played) D&D. In considerable wargaming travels in the USA I never encountered anyone who played T&T, though D&D players are everywhere, and I’ve not even heard of anyone in this country who plays it. When it first appeared in America I said there was no point in it, and nothing has occurred to change my opinion.”
Saturday, 2 November 2024
Miskatonic Monday #311: Lights in the Trees
Much like the Jonstown Compendium for RuneQuest: Roleplaying in Glorantha and The Companions of Arthur for material set in Greg Stafford’s masterpiece of Arthurian legend and romance, Pendragon, the Miskatonic Repository for Call of Cthulhu, Seventh Edition is a curated platform for user-made content. It is thus, “...a new way for creators to publish and distribute their own original Call of Cthulhu content including scenarios, settings, spells and more…” To support the endeavours of their creators, Chaosium has provided templates and art packs, both free to use, so that the resulting releases can look and feel as professional as possible. To support the efforts of these contributors, Miskatonic Monday is an occasional series of reviews which will in turn examine an item drawn from the depths of the Miskatonic Repository.
Author: Matt ‘Doc’ Tracey
Setting: New York, 1975
What You Get: Forty-three page, 19.46 MB Full Colour PDF
Elevator Pitch: War is hell and so are the memories



