On the tail of the Old School Renaissance has come another movement—the rise of the fanzine. Although the fanzine—a nonprofessional and nonofficial publication produced by fans of a particular cultural phenomenon, got its start in Science Fiction fandom, in the gaming hobby it first started with Chess and Diplomacy fanzines before finding fertile ground in the roleplaying hobby in the 1970s. Here these amateurish publications allowed the hobby a public space for two things. First, they were somewhere that the hobby could voice opinions and ideas that lay outside those of a game’s publisher. Second, in the Golden Age of roleplaying when the Dungeon Masters were expected to create their own settings and adventures, they also provided a rough and ready source of support for the game of your choice. Many also served as vehicles for the fanzine editor’s house campaign and thus they showed how another Dungeon Master and group played said game. This would often change over time if a fanzine accepted submissions. Initially, fanzines were primarily dedicated to the big three RPGs of the 1970s—Dungeons & Dragons, RuneQuest, and Traveller—but fanzines have appeared dedicated to other RPGs since, some of which helped keep a game popular in the face of no official support.
Since 2008 with the publication of Fight On #1, the Old School Renaissance has had its own fanzines. The advantage of the Old School Renaissance is that the various Retroclones draw from the same source and thus one Dungeons & Dragons-style RPG is compatible with another. This means that the contents of one fanzine will be compatible with the Retroclone that you already run and play even if not specifically written for it. Labyrinth Lord and Lamentations of the Flame Princess Weird Fantasy Roleplay have proved to be popular choices to base fanzines around, as has Swords & Wizardry. As new fanzines have appeared, there has been an interest in the fanzines of the past, and as that interest has grown, they have become highly collectible, and consequently more difficult to obtain and write about. However, in writing about them, the reader should be aware that these fanzines were written and published between thirty and forty years ago, typically by roleplayers in their teens and twenties. What this means is that sometimes the language and terminology used reflects this and though the language and terminology is not socially acceptable today, that use should not be held against the authors and publishers unduly.
The Beholder was a British fanzine first published in April, 1979. Dedicated to Dungeons & Dragons and Advanced Dungeons & Dragons, it ran to twenty-seven issues, the last being published in July, 1981. It was popular and would be awarded ‘Best Games Fanzine’ at the Games Day convention in 1980. After the final issue of The Beholder, the editors would go on to release a number of anthologies which collected content from the complete run of the fanzine such as Beholder Supplement Glossary of Magic, which collected many of the magical items which appeared in the fanzine and collated them into a series of tables for easy use by the Dungeon Master, and Fantasie Scenarios – The Fanzine Supplement No. 2, the first of several scenario anthologies.
The Beholder Issue No. 6 was published in September 1979. It is heralded as the DragonMeet II edition and even has a competition that would be run at the convention. The editors—Michael Stoner and Guy Duke—implore readers to submit ides for the forthcoming monster issue, likely to be Issue 7 or Issue 8, but otherwise, the issue covers a broad of Dungeons & Dragons-related topics. There are dungeons and adventures, monsters and more. This issue is very much a grab bag of topics and articles, and so varies in quality. It is not entirely clear as to who wrote what in the issue.
The first article is ‘Sounds’. This explores the role of generic sounds in dungeons and their possible effects. They range from ‘Laughter’ and ‘Howling’ to ‘Singing’ and ‘Bangs’. The possible effects are obvious, such as ‘Groaning’ making the Player Characters uneasy and if a Saving Throw versus magic is failed, imposing a penalty on to hit rolls, and even lowering their Morale. It feels overdone, but the effects could be lessened essentially to provide atmosphere in a dungeon. This is followed by ‘Runes’, which is interesting because it is not simply a reiteration of classic Norse Runes done for Dungeons & Dragons Dwarves or Elves. Essentially, they are one-use magical gold runes that when slapped onto a surface have particular effects. For example, ‘Rune of Tremors’ is slapped on the floor or ground, and when it vanishes the ground begins to shake, slightly at first, and then with increasing intensity, causing localised earthquake. A ‘Rune of Resurrection’, which is an evil run, will restore someone to life, but will turn one of the undead to dust! Weirdly, Runes are clever and will actually try to teleport away if someone tries to identify magically, or even activate itself if it has an effect that would work that way. There are some intriguing ideas here, but the ramifications of the way in which they are set-up are not as fully developed as they could be.
The monsters in ‘Monster Summoning’ are not particularly interesting. They include the Chameleonmen, evil humanoids that have all the abilities of a Chameleon; the Giant Chameleon, a ten-foot version, but otherwise the same as the normal reptile apart from the powerful tongue which as a stun effect; similarly, the Giant Snail; the Tarhospehk is a bovine creature with a human face and ivory horns summoned to guard ancient tombs, burial barge, and pyramids; the Living Hole which lies in wait for the unwary, waiting for them to fall in and dissolve in the acid at the bottom; the Mushroom which uses its head to attack; the Sound Eater, which looks like the demon, Juiblex, and uses its tentacles to suck up sound and so grow Hit Die by Hit Die; and the Flame Spirit. None of the monsters really stand out and ultimately feel as if they should be thrown into a table of random monsters rather than be used to populate a setting, let alone a dungeon. The Giant Snail and the Tarhospehk are attributed to Barney Sloan later in the issue.
‘DM’s Corner’ is the first of a series new to The Beholder. This gives good advice for the then prospective Dungeon Master such as placing tougher monsters deeper into the dungeon, theming levels if not the whole dungeon, make the dungeon tough for the players and their characters, that monsters do not always wants to fight to death, and ensure that it is fun to play. It gives a checklist for the Dungeon Master to work through prior to the campaign, much like a ‘Session Zero’, and also an example of play in a living dungeon as well as an analysis of it. The advice is solid and would have been useful at the time, but would likely have been repeated at the time as it subsequently has. The example of play and its analysis is interesting as it illustrates how the monsters in the example, a tribe of Kobolds, are acting intelligently and used the Player Characters’ mistakes against them. Overall, good advice for 1979, and solid advice today, if familiar.
The monsters in ‘Monster Summoning’ are not particularly interesting. They include the Chameleonmen, evil humanoids that have all the abilities of a Chameleon; the Giant Chameleon, a ten-foot version, but otherwise the same as the normal reptile apart from the powerful tongue which as a stun effect; similarly, the Giant Snail; the Tarhospehk is a bovine creature with a human face and ivory horns summoned to guard ancient tombs, burial barge, and pyramids; the Living Hole which lies in wait for the unwary, waiting for them to fall in and dissolve in the acid at the bottom; the Mushroom which uses its head to attack; the Sound Eater, which looks like the demon, Juiblex, and uses its tentacles to suck up sound and so grow Hit Die by Hit Die; and the Flame Spirit. None of the monsters really stand out and ultimately feel as if they should be thrown into a table of random monsters rather than be used to populate a setting, let alone a dungeon. The Giant Snail and the Tarhospehk are attributed to Barney Sloan later in the issue.
‘DM’s Corner’ is the first of a series new to The Beholder. This gives good advice for the then prospective Dungeon Master such as placing tougher monsters deeper into the dungeon, theming levels if not the whole dungeon, make the dungeon tough for the players and their characters, that monsters do not always wants to fight to death, and ensure that it is fun to play. It gives a checklist for the Dungeon Master to work through prior to the campaign, much like a ‘Session Zero’, and also an example of play in a living dungeon as well as an analysis of it. The advice is solid and would have been useful at the time, but would likely have been repeated at the time as it subsequently has. The example of play and its analysis is interesting as it illustrates how the monsters in the example, a tribe of Kobolds, are acting intelligently and used the Player Characters’ mistakes against them. Overall, good advice for 1979, and solid advice today, if familiar.
There are two scenarios in The Beholder Issue No. 6. The first is ‘Micro-Dungeon’, a well-designed little Kobold lair whose occupants make good use of their terrain. So, there are rocks that they can roll down a slope onto any intruders, a big Kobold hides in ambush ready to block of their movement with a Wand of Web, and so on. Apart from a group of Living Holes, which are a much deadlier threat, this is a low Level addition that could be run as is, or added to an existing dungeon without too much difficulty.
If ‘Micro-Dungeon’ is serviceable, then ‘Of Brae-Land and Wold’ is a much more sophisticated and interesting affair. Designed for Player Characters of Third to Fifth Level, it is a Tolkienesque pastiche directly inspired by the flight of the Hobbits from Bree eastwards towards to Weathertop as detailed in The Fellowship of the Ring. The scenario is a hex-crawl across the region north of the road, starting at the village of Brae-bank, with the Player Characters as agents of the Gods having to contend with ‘The Evil Forces of Static Economy of Brae-land and Wold’. Or simply, the Foe. They will be sent out again and again by the mysterious Wayfarer (and definitely not Aragon, and nor is the fake Wayfarer who attempts to ambush them) each time to find one of the three ‘Forces’, artefacts that they need to cast into the Spring of Romen and so help them defeat ‘The Evil Forces of Static Economy of Brae-land and Wold’. The Player Characters will be harried along the way by ‘Black Riders’ as they travel back and forth.
‘Of Brae-Land and Wold’ is expansive, but not as easy to run as it could be. Although there is advice on running it, the scenario is densely presented and difficult to parse and so challenging for the Dungeon Master to present to her players. It does not help that the maps provided for the scenario are a little too difficult to read in the case of the area map and in the case of the other two, are not of the adventuring locations for the scenario, but of notable villages in the scenario’s version of not-Middle-earth. Which means that Dungeon Master has to work harder to visualise the adventuring locations and try impart that to her players. Given the influence of Tolkien and Middle-earth on Dungeons & Dragons, it is no surprise to see a scenario like this appear in a fanzine, but it is just a little too ambitious. Lastly, in keeping with Middle-earth and Tolkien, there is very little treasure to be found and so the scenario recommends that the Game Master reward the Player Characters with a generous Experience Point bonus as recompense.
Surprisingly, given that it is a fanzine, what The Beholder does not have is a letters page. A letters page can be a boon and a bane. It can help foster a sense of community around the fanzine and it is a good way to fill a page or two of each issue, but the content has to be carefully curated lest it devolve into a fractious bearpit. The Beholder Issue No. 6 introduces a ‘Letters’ page. Kept to a single page, it is not so much a letters page as a ‘Questions & Answers’ page in response to some of the feedback that the editors have received. The answers in turn explain why a month is not put on each issue (because the editors wanted to avoid issues slipping from schedule and to avoid dating issues); why the fanzine does not do dungeon write-ups, that is, write-ups of a group exploring a dungeon (popular at the time, and the reason the editors had not included them because it was something another fanzine, Underground Oracle, was renowned for and they did not want to step on, but with that then being no more, dungeon write-ups would be included in future issues); and the call for more dungeons, especially competition dungeons (the editors say that the dungeons are popular, but appear to want to include non-dungeon scenarios too, and planned to include competition dungeons in the future). Oddly, no one letter writer is named and the result is not very much not what you would expect a traditional letters page to be.
Surprisingly, given that it is a fanzine, what The Beholder does not have is a letters page. A letters page can be a boon and a bane. It can help foster a sense of community around the fanzine and it is a good way to fill a page or two of each issue, but the content has to be carefully curated lest it devolve into a fractious bearpit. The Beholder Issue No. 6 introduces a ‘Letters’ page. Kept to a single page, it is not so much a letters page as a ‘Questions & Answers’ page in response to some of the feedback that the editors have received. The answers in turn explain why a month is not put on each issue (because the editors wanted to avoid issues slipping from schedule and to avoid dating issues); why the fanzine does not do dungeon write-ups, that is, write-ups of a group exploring a dungeon (popular at the time, and the reason the editors had not included them because it was something another fanzine, Underground Oracle, was renowned for and they did not want to step on, but with that then being no more, dungeon write-ups would be included in future issues); and the call for more dungeons, especially competition dungeons (the editors say that the dungeons are popular, but appear to want to include non-dungeon scenarios too, and planned to include competition dungeons in the future). Oddly, no one letter writer is named and the result is not very much not what you would expect a traditional letters page to be.
‘Info’ is really an extension of the editorial inside the front cover, highlighting upcoming events and giving some corrections. The penultimate article ‘Alignment’ highlights how Alignment is the most controversial part of Dungeons & Dragons, and so the article gives some suggestions as how the editors play them. This is with tight interpretations of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons, First Edition’s Alignment. Thus, Chaotic Evil is “One for psychopaths.”, whereas Chaotic Neutral is easy in that a Player Character of this Alignment act randomly, his player roll for choices and actions at each and every turn. Lawful Good is described as, “…[p]robably the most sickening of alignments.” as its adherents are typical nice guys. The result is an article that is likely to be as controversial as any other on the subject, especially given the rigidity of it interpretations.
The issue comes to a close with ‘Mini-Review’. This is a thumbnail review of the classic, S1 Tomb of Horrors. It opens with, “TSR continue to turn out dungeons at an impressive rate. Of these the best so far is, without doubt, S1 Tomb of Horrors.” It highlights the need for high-Level Player Characters and says that, “This is a thinking man's dungeon, packed full of tricks and traps many of which are fatal if tackled wrongly.” The review is short, and more helpful than insightful. S1 Tomb of Horrors is, of course, one of the most reviewed and analysed of scenarios for Advanced Dungeons & Dragons, First Edition. It is interesting to see what someone thought about the scenario at the time, but does not add anything of note to the discourse about the scenario.
Physically, The Beholder Issue No. 6 is slightly untidy in places, but readable. The layout is tight and that does make it difficult to read in places. The illustrations are reasonable, but the cartography, certainly for the scenario, ‘Of Brae-Land and Wold’, does not support the issue as well as it should. The cover is notable as having been drawn by Simon Washbourne, later designer of roleplaying games such as Lashings of Ginger Beer.
The Beholder has a high reputation for content that is of good quality and playable and in coming back to these issues, it is clear that these early issues do not yet meet that reputation. There are highlights in any issue, but not yet the consistency of that reputation, and The Beholder Issue No. 6 reflects that as a whole. This is because there are no real highlights in the issue and the potential highlight, the scenario ‘Of Brae-Land and Wold’, fails to meet the ambitions of its authors. The Beholder Issue No. 6 is possibly worth picking over for some of its ideas, such as ‘Runes’, but this is only a serviceable issue at best.
No comments:
Post a Comment